| Author |
Message |
| Goto page Previous 1, 2 |
| PleasureBonBon Forum -> PleasureBonBon.com Discussions ~ The female Royal avatars ordered by height |
|
 Posted:
Thu Jul 21, 2011 9:20 am
|
|
|
Royal Member of BonBon
Joined: 04 Oct 2008
Posts: 2914
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
| Posted:
Thu Jul 21, 2011 1:04 pm
|
|
|
Rank: Super Veteran
Joined: 04 Jul 2011
Posts: 1665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted:
Thu Jul 21, 2011 1:06 pm
|
|
|
Royal Member of BonBon
Joined: 04 Oct 2008
Posts: 2914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted:
Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:17 pm
|
|
|
Royal Member of BonBon
Joined: 13 Apr 2008
Posts: 2620
|
|
| Caroline wrote: |
And, I do find one of the more cuter pictures Vanessa has drawn is where Caroline is helping a customer light his cigar, and the customer is like... 50% taller than Caroline is. Not really sure why, just... that it appeals to me. ))
|
I like seeing these height differences in the comic as well. Especially when the Royal avatars interact with others characters. I can't wait to see how Constance compares to Red.  |
_________________
Constance Mayflower's bio
Constance Mayflower's diary
The Mayflower Diaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted:
Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:20 pm
|
|
|
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 262
|
|
| Miss Scorpia wrote: |
Oh cool!!! Thanks for the list.
Hmmm.... I stick with 6'3".
|
(looks up at Miss Scorpia) 
  |
_________________
"That which is denied becomes that which is most desired, and that which is hidden becomes that which is most interesting. Consequently, a great deal of time and energy is spent trying to get at what is being kept from you."-John Denver |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted:
Sun Aug 07, 2011 6:00 pm
|
|
|
Rank: Super Veteran
Joined: 30 Sep 2009
Posts: 9138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted:
Sun Aug 07, 2011 6:24 pm
|
|
|
Rank: Super Veteran
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 2846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted:
Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:59 am
|
|
|
Royal Member of BonBon
Joined: 13 Apr 2008
Posts: 2620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted:
Thu Sep 22, 2011 9:48 am
|
|
|
Royal Member of BonBon
Joined: 23 Jan 2009
Posts: 1120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted:
Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:12 pm
|
|
|
Royal Member of BonBon
Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 4122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted:
Thu Mar 15, 2012 6:19 pm
|
|
|
Royal Member of BonBon
Joined: 13 Apr 2008
Posts: 2620
|
|
| Kiala_Tiagra wrote: |
|
well after seeing miss symphony feet to cm conversion i think my character is... around 5'6" or 5'7"
|
I've included your fursona as 5' 10"(for now) because that's what your description in the avatar request thread says, though I personally view her as shorter than that. 5' 6" or 5' 7" sounds right to me. |
_________________
Constance Mayflower's bio
Constance Mayflower's diary
The Mayflower Diaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted:
Thu Mar 22, 2012 3:57 am
|
|
|
Royal Member of BonBon
Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 4122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted:
Sat Mar 31, 2012 12:35 pm
|
|
|
Royal Member of BonBon
Joined: 22 Dec 2008
Posts: 2173
|
|
((Hey Symphony,
Odd sort of fashion / height question based on you recording the heights of the girls.
Were heels common in the late 1890s? What I mean is, I've seen the old advertisements for ladies shoes, and they have a spot of heel on them, but... nothing more than like an inch or so. Even most of the heels that Vanessa draws her girls with are more of a working height, and not a glamour height. A "working height" being an inch or so, while "glamour" is more along a 3 inch or higher, so as to make the girl appear that much taller. So... were ladies shoes of the time pretty much flats? )) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted:
Wed Apr 18, 2012 4:25 pm
|
|
|
Royal Member of BonBon
Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1000
|
|
I'm no expert, but I suspect that shorter heels were the fashion then. And I imagine that they were not strongly made enough to support really large heeled shoes without some notable expense, anyway.
Besides, I think small and adorable was considered possibly more appealing than tall and striking. |
_________________
"Doktor! Are you sure this will work?!" "HAHA! I HAVE NO IDEA!" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted:
Wed Apr 18, 2012 9:30 pm
|
|
|
Royal Member of BonBon
Joined: 29 May 2009
Posts: 6010
|
|
| Considering that men enjoyed women smaller since it allowed them to assert more dominance, rather than taller where it would take that sense of pride away. |
_________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted:
Sun Jul 14, 2013 4:20 am
|
|
|
Royal Member of BonBon
Joined: 13 Apr 2008
Posts: 2620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
